民机纵向静稳定性试飞方法研究
DOI:
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:


Research on Flight Test Method of Longitudinal Static Stability for Civil Aircraft
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    目前国内民用运输机执行纵向静稳定性试飞时主要采用稳态法,而此方法存在试验时因飞行高度变化过大过快而难以采集足够试飞数据的缺点。针对FAA 咨询通告AC25-7C 中提出的两种关于纵向静稳定性的试飞方法进行对比分析,从而考察平飞加减速法的可执行性,分析传统的稳态法和新的平飞加减速法的优缺点和实际飞行试验时的可行性,得出初步结论为平飞加减速法有其独特的优点,主要适用于能平飞配平的试验点,而对于飞机发动机设置于最大推力和慢车推力试验点的适用性,还需通过试验进一步考察确定。

    Abstract:

    The conventional way to perform the longitudinal static stability flight test for civil transport aircraft is stabilized method. While the main disadvantage of the stabilized method is insufficiency of flight test data due to the fast and large altitude changing. This article focuses on the advantage and disadvantage about the applicability of the longitudinal flight test methods proposed by AC25-7C, which are stabilized method and acceleration-deceleration method. The initial conclusion is that the acceleration-deceleration method can apply to the level flight trim test points, and the method is still to be confirmed by simulator test and flight test during the applicability of the maximum thrust and idle thrust test points.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

殷湘涛、王勇、赖培军、朱海云、孙明明、裘志杰.民机纵向静稳定性试飞方法研究[J].民用飞机设计与研 究,2016(1):25-Yin Xiangtao、Wang Yong、Lai Peijun、Zhu Haiyun、Sun Mingming、Qiu Zhijie. Research on Flight Test Method of Longitudinal Static Stability for Civil Aircraft[J]. Civil Aircraft Design and Research,2016,(1):25-. ( in Chinese)

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2016-04-08
  • 出版日期:

微信公众号二维码

手机版网站二维码

我要投稿 投稿指南 联系我们 二维码
TOP